|
|
| Growth in Flexible
Learning |
Working With Schools
The case study involved us working in collaboration with three(3) secondary schools in the region. This drew
the participation of thirty-nine young learners. The future
scene for flexible learning mandates that we develop the required expertise in flexible learning to enable us to
meet the needs of learners as they leave compulsory education in secondary schools in order to achieve
a seamless transition to further education - TAFE and/or ACE.
The future of flexible learning, itself, requires
us to involve young learners and to learn from their experience.
Career Pathways
The dilemma faced by young adults in formulating their future career and life pathways can, in some part, be
resolved by exposure to the prevailing forms of employment opportunity. This level of opportunity is reflected
somewhat in the emphasis placed into the development of contemporary resources for specific industries and
employment disciplines.
Within this case study, we have availed ourselves of "state-of-the-art" learning resources that complement
the industry and career information needs of young people.
Transition to Further Education
Underpinning the nature of this study are
concerns that individuals be given the opportunity to ‘taste’ vocations as the
forming guides to career and further education options, and that the transition
to further education from initial education be given a ‘seamlesness’, so that
any potential ‘gulf’ between the two stages of education can be minimized.
Through the involvement of principals, careers teachers and IT teachers in
local secondary colleges, the conduct of this study established a deeper level
of communication and understanding with those in the colleges who are key
players in aiding the smooth transition for secondary students. We were also
able to engage 39 secondary students in the study. These were all at year 10
level, arguably a time critical to optimizing the development of career
pathways through a clear view of options. The teachers involved commented on
the high level of interest generated among the students, and the collaboration
with teachers and principals served to expand their understanding of Flexible
Learning Framework products available.
For the adult learners involved,
engagement in the study enabled an expansion of options accessibility through
viewing the toolboxes generally. In particular, however, participating in the
actual use of the new Aged Care Services toolbox proved a valuable experience,
and one especially relevant to those currently studying Aged Care certificates.
The response to the toolbox as a learning tool was overwhelmingly positive,
with many expressing their intention to explore it more fully in their own time
to assist in their studies. Participation in the study also allowed an insight
into the broader picture of qualifications available in related areas covered
in the Community Services training package, thus enhancing and expanding their
opportunities.

A further aspect of this study has been
its contribution to clarifying and highlighting the potential professional
development needs of tutors/ teachers. If secondary school teachers are to
continue their contribution to their student’s transition to further education,
then surely a clear view of available tools and resources, and understanding
their potential, could be considered a key element to success in achieving
this. In the adult education arena, the potential of learning tools such as
toolboxes can only be fully exploited if professional development allows for
tutors to gain, and maintain, the abilities required to use the technology
intrinsic to such tools. During Flexible Learning Week 2004 we at CDAEG will be
conducting professional development sessions for our tutors, particularly aimed
at enhancing understanding the toolboxes available through the Australian
Flexible Learning Framework and exploring their potential for the courses we
deliver.
In addition to professional development
needs, this study has highlighted some important issues with regard to the
flexible learning initiative that would extend beyond the scope of this study.
Among these are: The very nature of toolboxes would appear to assume learners
using them are somewhat self-regulated and self-motivated in their learning.
Would best-practice require the integration of toolboxes into courses to
accommodate not only the self-directed learners but also the more pedagogically
dependent? Also, could resources such as toolboxes be introduced at the point
of course design, and if so, how then will professional development needs of
tutors/ assessors be met? This would also raise the issue of dealing with
variances in the skill levels of learners, as well as their preferences in
learning styles. While many challenges will no doubt continue to be presented,
we look toward the future of flexible learning options such as toolboxes with
greater recognition of their potential to aid growth in learners and contribute
to expanding options for those in rural communities.
| |
|